The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco-ligamentous complex.

STUDY DESIGN: The classification system was derived through a literature review and expert opinion of experienced spine surgeons. In addition, a multicenter reliability and validity study of the system was conducted on a collection of trauma cases. OBJECTIVES: To define a novel classification system for subaxial cervical spine trauma that conveys information about injury pattern, severity, treatment considerations, and prognosis. To evaluate reliability and validity of this system. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Classification of subaxial cervical spine injuries remains largely descriptive, lacking standardization and prognostic information. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic variables encountered in subaxial cervical trauma were identified by a working section of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Significant limitations of existing systems were defined and addressed within the new system. This system, as well as the Harris and Ferguson & Allen systems, was applied by 20 spine surgeons to 11 cervical trauma cases. Six weeks later, the cases were randomly reordered and again scored. Interrater reliability, intrarater reliability, and validity were assessed. RESULTS: Each of 3 main categories (injury morphology, disco-ligamentous complex, and neurologic status) identified as integrally important to injury classification was assigned a weighted score; the injury severity score was obtained by summing the scores from each category. Treatment options were assigned based on threshold values of the severity score. Interrater agreement as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient of the DLC, morphology, and neurologic status scores was 0.49, 0.57, and 0.87, respectively. Intrarater agreement as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient of the DLC, morphology, and neurologic status scores was 0.66, 0.75, and 0.90, respectively. Raters agreed with treatment recommendations of the algorithm in 93.3% of cases, suggesting high construct validity. The reliability compared favorably to the Harris and Ferguson & Allen systems. CONCLUSION: The Sub-axial Injury Classification and Severity Scale provides a comprehensive classification system for subaxial cervical trauma. Early validity and reliability data are encouraging.

Assessment of injury to the thoracolumbar posterior ligamentous complex in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiography.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) is thought to contribute significantly to the stability of thoracolumbar spine. Obvious translation or dislocation of an interspace clearly denotes injury to the PLC. A recent survey of the Spine Trauma Study Group indicated that plain radiographic findings, if present, are most helpful in determining PLC injury. However, confusion exists when plain radiography shows injury to the anterior spinal column without significant kyphosis or widening of the posterior interspinous space. PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to identify imaging parameters that may suggest a disruption of the posterior ligamentous complex of the thoracolumbar spine in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiographs. This study was performed, in part, as a pilot study to determine critical imaging parameters to be included in a future prospective, randomized, multicenter study. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Survey analysis of the Spine Trauma Study Group. PATIENT SAMPLE: None. OUTCOME MEASURES: Compilation and statistical analysis of survey results. METHODS: Based on a systematic review of the English literature from 1949 to present, we identified a series of traits not found on plain X-rays that were consistent with PLC injury. This included five imaging findings on either computed tomography (CT) scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and several physical examination features. These items were placed on a survey and sent to the members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. They were asked to rank the items from most important to least important in representing an injury to the PLC in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiographs. RESULTS: Thirty-three of 47 surveys were returned for final analysis. Thirty-nine percent (13/33) of the members ranked "disrupted PLC components (i.e., interspinous ligament, supraspinous ligament, ligamentum flavum) on T1 sagittal MRI" as the most important factor in determining disruption of PLC. When analyzed with a point-weighted system, "diastasis of the facet joints on CT" received the most points, indicating that this category was ranked high by the majority of the members of the group. The members were also given freedom to add other criteria that they believed were important in determining PLC integrity in the setting of normal-appearing plain radiograph. Of the other criteria suggested, one included a physical finding and the other a variant of MR sequencing. CONCLUSIONS: In a setting of normal-appearing plain radiographs, PLC injury as displayed on T1-weighted MRI and diastasis of the facet joints on CT scan seem to be the most popular determinants of probable PLC injury among members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Between MRI and CT scan, most members feel that various characteristics on MRI studies were more helpful.

Assessment of injury to the posterior ligamentous complex in thoracolumbar spine trauma.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Posterior ligamentous complex (PLC), consisting of supraspinous ligament (SSL), interspinous ligament (ISL), ligamentum flavum (LF), and the facet joint capsules is thought to contribute significantly to the stability of thoracolumbar spine. Currently, no consensus exists on radiographic imaging parameters that may indicate injury to the posterior ligamentous complex. PURPOSE: To identify imaging parameters that may suggest a disruption of the PLC of the thoracolumbar spine. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: A survey analysis of members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. PATIENT SAMPLE: None. OUTCOMES MEASURES: Compilation of survey results. METHODS: An extensive review of the literature from 1949 to the present was performed to identify key radiographic elements that have been suggested as indicators of PLC injury. Twelve items identified as such were placed on a survey and sent to the members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. They were asked to rank the items from most important to least important, and the results were compiled for analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight surveys were returned for final analysis. Fifty-percent (14/28) of the members ranked "vertebral body translation" on plain radiographs as the most important factor in determining disruption of PLC. Plain radiographic signs were ranked higher than computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging indicators, and history of the mechanism ranked lowest. The members were also given freedom to add other criteria that they felt were important in determining PLC integrity. "Interspinous spacing 7 mm greater than that of level above or below on antero posterior plain X-rays" was the only new category that was suggested. CONCLUSION: Plain radiographic findings were felt to be most helpful in determining PLC injury by the members of the Spine Trauma Study Group. Physical examination findings and history of the mechanism of injury were ranked lower than imaging studies. Future analysis should focus on indicators of PLC injury when plain radiographic findings are either subtle or not present.

Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary understanding of the biomechanics, natural history, and methods of treating thoracolumbar spine injuries continues to evolve. Current classification schemes of these injuries, however, can be either too simplified or overly complex for clinical use. METHODS: The Spine Trauma Group was given a survey to identify similarities in treatment algorithms for common thoracolumbar injuries, as well as to identify characteristics of injury that played a key role in the decision-making process. RESULTS: Based on the survey, the Spine Trauma Group has developed a classification system and an injury severity score (thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score, or TLICS), which may facilitate communication between physicians and serve as a guideline for treating these injuries. The classification system is based on the morphology of the injury, integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and neurological status of the patient. Points are assigned for each category, and the final total points suggest a possible treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: The usefulness of this new system will have to be proven in future studies investigating inter- and intraobserver reliability, as well as long-term outcome studies for operative and nonoperative treatment methods.

The thoracolumbar injury severity score: a proposed treatment algorithm.

OBJECTIVE: Significant controversy exists regarding the optimal management of thoracolumbar injuries. This is in part due to the lack of understanding of the natural history of various injury subtypes and the absence of a universally accepted classification scheme that facilitates communication among care providers and assists in directing treatment. The Spine Trauma Study Group has developed an injury severity score based on three major variables: the mechanism of injury determined by radiographic appearance, the integrity of the posterior ligamentous complex, and the neurologic status of the patient. By systematically assigning specific point values within each category based on the severity of injury, a final severity score may be generated that can be used to help direct treatment. The goal of this work is to present a proposal of a detailed treatment algorithm to assist in the nonoperative or operative management of thoracolumbar injuries. METHODS: A detailed review of the world's spinal literature was performed to ascertain predictors of instability following thoracolumbar trauma. With use of known biomechanical and clinical outcome measures, an arbitrary assignment of point values to various injury descriptors was performed. The assessment of the validity of the severity score was compared retrospectively with a variety of selected cases representing the typical injury patterns under the three major injury groups: compression, translational/rotational, and distraction injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed treatment algorithm is an attempt to assist physicians using best-evidence medicine in managing thoracolumbar spinal injuries. The final point flow chart with graduated treatment recommendations is only preliminary and needs to be validated through prospective cohort analysis. In addition, the importance of the chosen variables determining spinal stability must also be verified.